LIVE
Anthropic says Claude helped trace the origin of NIST's mysterious ECDSA seeds16/10/26 · Anthropic|Reflection AI unveils Beam, a 501-billion-parameter open model16/10/26 · Reflection AI|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, a mixture-of-experts model built for local Mac Studio inference15/10/26 · Meta|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, an open-weight multimodal model15/10/26 · Meta|Google DeepMind outlines safety measures behind Gemini 4 Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Tev-Gym: A Training Recipe to Fix Sparse Rewards in Long-Horizon Agents13/10/26|Google DeepMind references Gemini 4, code-named Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Google DeepMind unveils Gemini 4 Argon, a robotics-focused variant13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Character.AI files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sells assets to Disney13/10/26 · Character.AI|Study Shows AI Models Can Provably Conceal Arbitrary Capabilities13/10/26|Researchers strand Claude on a virtual desert island to study unscripted behavior19/10/26 · Anthropic|Together AI introduces hybrid agents that reason in latent space18/10/26 · Together AI|Anthropic says Claude helped trace the origin of NIST's mysterious ECDSA seeds16/10/26 · Anthropic|Reflection AI unveils Beam, a 501-billion-parameter open model16/10/26 · Reflection AI|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, a mixture-of-experts model built for local Mac Studio inference15/10/26 · Meta|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, an open-weight multimodal model15/10/26 · Meta|Google DeepMind outlines safety measures behind Gemini 4 Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Tev-Gym: A Training Recipe to Fix Sparse Rewards in Long-Horizon Agents13/10/26|Google DeepMind references Gemini 4, code-named Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Google DeepMind unveils Gemini 4 Argon, a robotics-focused variant13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Character.AI files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sells assets to Disney13/10/26 · Character.AI|Study Shows AI Models Can Provably Conceal Arbitrary Capabilities13/10/26|Researchers strand Claude on a virtual desert island to study unscripted behavior19/10/26 · Anthropic|Together AI introduces hybrid agents that reason in latent space18/10/26 · Together AI|
🇺🇸 United States🔬 ReasoningReleased April 2025

o3

OpenAI
EU hosting Card data 85/100 Trust Index 74
Verdict

A good performance / EU-hosting balance for a European company.

Overview

o3 uses a chain-of-thought architecture reinforced by RL: it "thinks" for several minutes before answering, making it extraordinarily strong on complex problems. It's the reference model for research, mathematical proofs, and algorithmic competitions. Cost and slowness reserve it for high-end use cases.

Skill profile

FrenchReasoningSpeedCreativitySafety
Arena Elo1432
Verified benchmarks
GPQA87.7%
SWE-Bench71.7%
MATH96.7%
MMLU88.5%
HumanEval96%

Three independent measures

What people prefer, what the model can do, what the market uses. Each source has its biases and none is enough on its own: we show them side by side, never blended.

Preference
Which answer do people prefer, blind?
1432Elo
Sensitive to answer style and length.
Capability
What can the model do on measured tasks?
20.2/ 100
Aggregates ten evaluations run by Artificial Analysis.
Adoption
What does the market actually use?
Not measured yet
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). CC BY 4.0
OpenRouter traffic only: measures adoption, not quality, and misses direct use of vendor APIs.

What do these scores mean?

GPQA87.7%excellent

PhD-level science questions (physics, chemistry, biology), with no tool access.

SWE-Bench71.7%very good

Resolving real GitHub issues under real conditions (SWE-bench Verified).

MATH96.7%world-class

Competition-level math problems.

MMLU88.5%excellent

General knowledge across dozens of academic subjects.

HumanEval96%world-class

Python code generation from specifications.

Strengths

  • Top-tier reasoning
  • Excellent at code
  • Strong French quality
  • World-class on Arena

Limitations

  • Average speed

Who is it for

A good fit if…
  • you need advanced reasoning or analysis
  • you build with a coding agent
  • you work in French
  • your data must stay in the EU
Skip it if…
  • you need very fast responses

Ideal use cases

  • Advanced math
  • Scientific research
  • Complex algorithms
  • Proofs
  • Competitions

Access & availability

Paid API per tokenConsumer subscription (~200€/mo)

Key specifications

Context
200K
Input price
$2.00/M
Output price
$8.00/M
Speed
30 tok/s
Price not auditedBenchmarks not audited

What it costs per month

Estimate from sourced API prices and a hardware tier for self-hosting. Assumptions are editable.

Via API
$70.0 / month
≈ 64.4 € · 20.0 M tokens
Self-hosted
Closed weights: no self-hosting

Assumptions: 36-month amortisation, 0.25 €/kWh, 22 days/month, 1 $ = 0.92 €. Excludes labour, software licences, redundancy.

nAIvigate Trust Index

74/100

What the vendor offers and documents for professional use in Europe. An undocumented criterion counts as zero and stays visible: the score rises when the vendor publishes, not when we assume.

20/20 criteria documented · 100 %

Data72
5/5 · 30 %
Sovereignty43
3/3 · 20 %
Transparency75
4/4 · 15 %
Enterprise100
6/6 · 20 %
Licence85
2/2 · 15 %
See the criteria▾
Data
EU data residency60
No transfer outside EU50
No training on your data
Configurable retention
Zero Data Retention50
Sovereignty
Self-hostable (open weights)
EU hosting offered
European vendorcountry: US30
Transparency
Published licence (URL)
Public, sourced pricing
Published compliance commitments
Subprocessor list published
Enterprise
DPA available
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
Audit logs
SOC 2 / ISO 27001
Vendor private endpoint
Licence
Commercial use allowed
Licence typeproprietary70
Full ranking and methodology

Trust Index badge

Show this score in your docs, README or security page. It updates automatically.

nAIvigate Trust Index · o3
[![nAIvigate Trust Index · o3](https://naivigate.com/badge/o3.svg?lang=en)](https://naivigate.com/en/model/o3)

Data & compliance

What we know, line by line, with source and date. These lines feed the Data and Enterprise families of the Trust Index above. GDPR compliance depends on your processing, not on the model alone.

EU data residencyOn request
Data processing agreement (DPA)Yes
Transfer outside the EUDepends on plan
Training on your dataNo
Configurable retentionYes
Zero Data RetentionOn request
Self-hostableNo
Declared hostingUS/EU
Anonymisable dataYes

Quality of this card’s data

85/100

This score measures the quality of the data on this card: price, context, Elo, licence, documented, sourced and fresh. It measures neither the model nor its compliance: for that, see the Trust Index above.

6/6 documented · 3/6 primary sources

API pricingofficial
Context windownAIvigate assessment
Arena EloLMArena, human preferenceindependent
Benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, SWE-bench…)vendor-reported, not cross-checkednAIvigate assessment
LicencenAIvigate assessment
Data & complianceofficial
Advanced data · for experts
Architecture, modalities, detailed cost, full benchmarks
▾
Architecture
Dense + RL
Size
undisclosed
Cutoff date
Nov 2024
Inputs
text, image
Outputs
text, code
License
proprietary
Hosting
US/EU
Hallucination score
4/5
Estimated cost (API)
Typical exchange (~3k in / 1k out)
≈ $0.0140
1M in + 1M out
≈ $10.00
All benchmarks
Arena Elo1432
MMLU88.5%
GPQA87.7%
HumanEval96.0%
SWE-Bench71.7%
MATH96.7%

Similar models

Articles mentioning it