LIVE
Anthropic says Claude helped trace the origin of NIST's mysterious ECDSA seeds16/10/26 · Anthropic|Reflection AI unveils Beam, a 501-billion-parameter open model16/10/26 · Reflection AI|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, a mixture-of-experts model built for local Mac Studio inference15/10/26 · Meta|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, an open-weight multimodal model15/10/26 · Meta|Google DeepMind outlines safety measures behind Gemini 4 Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Tev-Gym: A Training Recipe to Fix Sparse Rewards in Long-Horizon Agents13/10/26|Google DeepMind references Gemini 4, code-named Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Google DeepMind unveils Gemini 4 Argon, a robotics-focused variant13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Character.AI files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sells assets to Disney13/10/26 · Character.AI|Study Shows AI Models Can Provably Conceal Arbitrary Capabilities13/10/26|Websites are increasingly shutting out AI agents18/10/26|NVIDIA RTX Spark laptops bring local AI to premium Windows PCs17/10/26 · NVIDIA|Anthropic says Claude helped trace the origin of NIST's mysterious ECDSA seeds16/10/26 · Anthropic|Reflection AI unveils Beam, a 501-billion-parameter open model16/10/26 · Reflection AI|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, a mixture-of-experts model built for local Mac Studio inference15/10/26 · Meta|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, an open-weight multimodal model15/10/26 · Meta|Google DeepMind outlines safety measures behind Gemini 4 Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Tev-Gym: A Training Recipe to Fix Sparse Rewards in Long-Horizon Agents13/10/26|Google DeepMind references Gemini 4, code-named Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Google DeepMind unveils Gemini 4 Argon, a robotics-focused variant13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Character.AI files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sells assets to Disney13/10/26 · Character.AI|Study Shows AI Models Can Provably Conceal Arbitrary Capabilities13/10/26|Websites are increasingly shutting out AI agents18/10/26|NVIDIA RTX Spark laptops bring local AI to premium Windows PCs17/10/26 · NVIDIA|
🇺🇸 United States🎬 Video generationReleased October 2025

Veo 3.1

Google
Verdict

A versatile model, balanced across most use cases.

Overview

Veo 3.1 is Google's proprietary video generator, producing short clips with synchronized audio straight from a text prompt. It ranks decently on the text-to-video Arena leaderboard, but ships as a closed, API-only service: no open weights, no on-premise option, and per-second pricing with no free tier that can add up fast for heavy use. Because it's only reachable through Google's US-hosted Gemini API, European teams concerned about data residency should weigh that before adopting it at scale.

Skill profile

Not disclosed

Three independent measures

What people prefer, what the model can do, what the market uses. Each source has its biases and none is enough on its own: we show them side by side, never blended.

Preference
Which answer do people prefer, blind?
Not measured yet
Sensitive to answer style and length.
Capability
What can the model do on measured tasks?
960Elo
Artificial Analysis video arena, blind votes.
Adoption
What does the market actually use?
Not measured yet
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). CC BY 4.0
OpenRouter traffic only: measures adoption, not quality, and misses direct use of vendor APIs.

Limitations

  • No documented EU residency
  • API pricing not disclosed

Who is it for

A good fit if…
    Skip it if…
    • you handle sensitive data with no EU option

    Ideal use cases

    • Ad video prototyping
    • Short marketing content
    • Quick animated storyboards
    • Internal explainer videos

    Key specifications

    Context
    0
    Input price
    —
    Output price
    —
    Speed
    —
    Price not auditedBenchmarks not audited

    What it costs per month

    Estimate from sourced API prices and a hardware tier for self-hosting. Assumptions are editable.

    Via API
    API pricing not published
    Self-hosted
    Closed weights: no self-hosting

    Assumptions: 36-month amortisation, 0.25 €/kWh, 22 days/month, 1 $ = 0.92 €. Excludes labour, software licences, redundancy.

    nAIvigate Trust Index

    ≈ 15/100

    What the vendor offers and documents for professional use in Europe. An undocumented criterion counts as zero and stays visible: the score rises when the vendor publishes, not when we assume.

    8/20 criteria documented · 40 % · provisional: 50 % documented criteria or fewer

    Data0
    0/5 · 30 %
    Sovereignty10
    3/3 · 20 %
    Transparency0
    3/4 · 15 %
    Enterprise0
    0/6 · 20 %
    Licence85
    2/2 · 15 %
    See the criteria▾
    Data
    EU data residencynot documented
    No transfer outside EUnot documented
    No training on your datanot documented
    Configurable retentionnot documented
    Zero Data Retentionnot documented
    Sovereignty
    Self-hostable (open weights)
    EU hosting offered
    European vendorcountry: US30
    Transparency
    Published licence (URL)
    Public, sourced pricing
    Published compliance commitments
    Subprocessor list publishednot documented
    Enterprise
    DPA availablenot documented
    SSO / SAMLnot documented
    SCIM provisioningnot documented
    Audit logsnot documented
    SOC 2 / ISO 27001not documented
    Vendor private endpointnot documented
    Licence
    Commercial use allowed
    Licence typeproprietary70
    Full ranking and methodology

    Trust Index badge

    Show this score in your docs, README or security page. It updates automatically.

    nAIvigate Trust Index · Veo 3.1
    [![nAIvigate Trust Index · Veo 3.1](https://naivigate.com/badge/veo-3-1.svg?lang=en)](https://naivigate.com/en/model/veo-3-1)

    Data & compliance

    What we know, line by line, with source and date. These lines feed the Data and Enterprise families of the Trust Index above. GDPR compliance depends on your processing, not on the model alone.

    EU data residencyNot documented
    Data processing agreement (DPA)Not documented
    Transfer outside the EUNot documented
    Training on your dataNot documented
    Configurable retentionNot documented
    Zero Data RetentionNot documented
    Self-hostableNo
    Declared hostingUS
    Derived from declared hosting, not verified at source.Need an analysis in your context? Shadow AI Sentinel

    Quality of this card’s data

    20/100

    This score measures the quality of the data on this card: price, context, Elo, licence, documented, sourced and fresh. It measures neither the model nor its compliance: for that, see the Trust Index above.

    1/6 documented · 0/6 primary sources

    API pricingmissing
    Context windowmissing
    Arena Elomissing
    Benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, SWE-bench…)missing
    LicencenAIvigate assessment
    Data & compliancemissing
    Advanced data · for experts
    Architecture, modalities, detailed cost, full benchmarks
    ▾
    Architecture
    —
    Size
    —
    Cutoff date
    —
    Inputs
    text, image
    Outputs
    video
    License
    proprietary
    Hosting
    US
    Hallucination score
    —
    Estimated cost (API)
    Typical exchange (~3k in / 1k out)
    Not disclosed
    1M in + 1M out
    Not disclosed
    All benchmarks
    Arena Elo—
    MMLU—
    GPQA—
    HumanEval—
    SWE-Bench—
    MATH—

    Similar models