Muse Wonder
A versatile model, balanced across most use cases.
Overview
Muse Wonder is Meta's generalist model, available only through its paid API, with a million-token context window geared toward code and agentic workflows. Its AA Intelligence Index score (52.4) is solid but unremarkable, and Meta's claimed parity with Opus 5.5 remains unconfirmed. The stronger Muse Wonder Full variant is reserved for Muse Code subscribers and isn't publicly documented. Hosted in the United States with no on-premise option, so data runs through Meta's own infrastructure.
Skill profile
Not disclosed
Strengths
- Very long context
Limitations
- No documented EU residency
Who is it for
- you handle sensitive data with no EU option
Ideal use cases
- Complex agent automation
- Code generation & review
- Long-document processing
- Multi-source research synthesis
Access & availability
Key specifications
What it costs per month
Estimate from sourced API prices and a hardware tier for self-hosting. Assumptions are editable.
Assumptions: 36-month amortisation, 0.25 €/kWh, 22 days/month, 1 $ = 0.92 €. Excludes labour, software licences, redundancy.
nAIvigate Trust Index
What the vendor offers and documents for professional use in Europe. An undocumented criterion counts as zero and stays visible: the score rises when the vendor publishes, not when we assume.
9/20 criteria documented · 45 % · provisional: 50 % documented criteria or fewer
See the criteria▾
Trust Index badge
Show this score in your docs, README or security page. It updates automatically.
[](https://naivigate.com/en/model/muse-wonder)Data & compliance
What we know, line by line, with source and date. These lines feed the Data and Enterprise families of the Trust Index above. GDPR compliance depends on your processing, not on the model alone.
| EU data residency | Not documented |
| Data processing agreement (DPA) | Not documented |
| Transfer outside the EU | Not documented |
| Training on your data | No |
| Configurable retention | Not documented |
| Zero Data Retention | Not documented |
| Self-hostable | No |
| Declared hosting | US |
Quality of this card’s data
This score measures the quality of the data on this card: price, context, Elo, licence, documented, sourced and fresh. It measures neither the model nor its compliance: for that, see the Trust Index above.
3/6 documented · 0/6 primary sources
| API pricing | nAIvigate assessment | |
| Context window | nAIvigate assessment | |
| Arena Elo | missing | |
| Benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, SWE-bench…) | missing | |
| Licence | nAIvigate assessment | |
| Data & compliance | missing |
Advanced data · for expertsArchitecture, modalities, detailed cost, full benchmarks▾
| Arena Elo | — |
| MMLU | — |
| GPQA | — |
| HumanEval | — |
| SWE-Bench | — |
| MATH | — |