LIVE
Anthropic says Claude helped trace the origin of NIST's mysterious ECDSA seeds16/10/26 · Anthropic|Reflection AI unveils Beam, a 501-billion-parameter open model16/10/26 · Reflection AI|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, a mixture-of-experts model built for local Mac Studio inference15/10/26 · Meta|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, an open-weight multimodal model15/10/26 · Meta|Google DeepMind outlines safety measures behind Gemini 4 Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Tev-Gym: A Training Recipe to Fix Sparse Rewards in Long-Horizon Agents13/10/26|Google DeepMind references Gemini 4, code-named Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Google DeepMind unveils Gemini 4 Argon, a robotics-focused variant13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Character.AI files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sells assets to Disney13/10/26 · Character.AI|A Goodfire researcher reignites debate over how to understand neural networks19/10/26 · Goodfire|CERN and Mistral AI sign statement of intent for scientific AI partnership19/10/26 · Mistral AI|Mistral AI releases Timestral, a foundation model for time-series data19/10/26 · Mistral AI|Anthropic says Claude helped trace the origin of NIST's mysterious ECDSA seeds16/10/26 · Anthropic|Reflection AI unveils Beam, a 501-billion-parameter open model16/10/26 · Reflection AI|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, a mixture-of-experts model built for local Mac Studio inference15/10/26 · Meta|Meta releases Muse Spark Open, an open-weight multimodal model15/10/26 · Meta|Google DeepMind outlines safety measures behind Gemini 4 Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Tev-Gym: A Training Recipe to Fix Sparse Rewards in Long-Horizon Agents13/10/26|Google DeepMind references Gemini 4, code-named Argon13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Google DeepMind unveils Gemini 4 Argon, a robotics-focused variant13/10/26 · Google DeepMind|Character.AI files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sells assets to Disney13/10/26 · Character.AI|A Goodfire researcher reignites debate over how to understand neural networks19/10/26 · Goodfire|CERN and Mistral AI sign statement of intent for scientific AI partnership19/10/26 · Mistral AI|Mistral AI releases Timestral, a foundation model for time-series data19/10/26 · Mistral AI|
🇨🇳 China💻 CodeReleased April 2026

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI
Open-sourceFreeSelf-hostEU hosting Card data 58/100 Trust Index 90
Verdict

A solid pick for self-hosting and full data control.

Overview

Kimi K2.6 is Moonshot AI's flagship open-weight model: 1 trillion total parameters, 32B active per token (MoE, 384 experts), 256K context. Built for long-horizon agentic coding, orchestration of hundreds of sub-agents and full-stack generation. Multimodal (text, image, video), Modified MIT license, and very low pricing versus closed models. Stronger on agentic tasks than on pure reasoning.

Skill profile

FrenchReasoningSpeedCreativitySafety
Arena Elo1461
Verified benchmarks
GPQA90.5%

Three independent measures

What people prefer, what the model can do, what the market uses. Each source has its biases and none is enough on its own: we show them side by side, never blended.

Preference
Which answer do people prefer, blind?
1461Elo
Sensitive to answer style and length.
Capability
What can the model do on measured tasks?
27.0/ 100
Aggregates ten evaluations run by Artificial Analysis.
Adoption
What does the market actually use?
Not measured yet
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). CC BY 4.0
OpenRouter traffic only: measures adoption, not quality, and misses direct use of vendor APIs.

What do these scores mean?

GPQA90.5%world-class

PhD-level science questions (physics, chemistry, biology), with no tool access.

Strengths

  • World-class on Arena
  • Has a free tier
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Competitive input pricing

Limitations

  • Average speed
  • Light safety filters

Who is it for

A good fit if…
  • you build with a coding agent
  • you want to control cost or self-host
  • your data must stay in the EU
Skip it if…
  • you need very fast responses
  • you want strict guardrails

Ideal use cases

  • Long-horizon agentic coding and multi-agent orchestration
  • Full-stack generation (UI + backend)
  • Chinese and multilingual workloads

Access & availability

Paid API per tokenFree tier availableSelf-hostable (open weights)

Key specifications

Context
262K
Input price
$0.95/M
Output price
$4.00/M
Speed
—
Price verified Jul 2, 2026·Official source ↗Benchmarks not audited

What it costs per month

Estimate from sourced API prices and a hardware tier for self-hosting. Assumptions are editable.

Via API
$34.3 / month
≈ 31.5 € · 20.0 M tokens
Self-hosted
Closed weights: no self-hosting

Assumptions: 36-month amortisation, 0.25 €/kWh, 22 days/month, 1 $ = 0.92 €. Excludes labour, software licences, redundancy.

nAIvigate Trust Index

90/100

What the vendor offers and documents for professional use in Europe. An undocumented criterion counts as zero and stays visible: the score rises when the vendor publishes, not when we assume.

19/19 criteria documented · 100 % · 12 of them set by rule

Data100
5/5 · 30 %
Sovereignty67
3/3 · 20 %
Transparency75
4/4 · 15 %
Enterprise100
5/5 · 20 %
Licence100
2/2 · 15 %
See the criteria▾
Data
EU data residencyset by rule
No transfer outside EUset by rule
No training on your dataset by rule
Configurable retentionset by rule
Zero Data Retentionset by rule
Sovereignty
Self-hostable (open weights)
EU hosting offeredset by rule
European vendorcountry: CN
Transparency
Published licence (URL)
Public, sourced pricing
Published compliance commitmentsset by rule
Subprocessor list publishedset by rule
Enterprise
DPA available
SSO / SAMLset by rule
SCIM provisioningset by rule
Audit logsset by rule
SOC 2 / ISO 27001not applicable
Vendor private endpointset by rule
Licence
Commercial use allowed
Licence typemodified-mit
Full ranking and methodology

Trust Index badge

Show this score in your docs, README or security page. It updates automatically.

nAIvigate Trust Index · Kimi K2.6
[![nAIvigate Trust Index · Kimi K2.6](https://naivigate.com/badge/kimi-k2-6.svg?lang=en)](https://naivigate.com/en/model/kimi-k2-6)

Data & compliance

What we know, line by line, with source and date. These lines feed the Data and Enterprise families of the Trust Index above. GDPR compliance depends on your processing, not on the model alone.

EU data residencyYes
Data processing agreement (DPA)N/A· self-hosted: data never leaves
Transfer outside the EUNo
Training on your dataNo
Configurable retentionN/A· self-hosted: data never leaves
Zero Data RetentionN/A· self-hosted: data never leaves
Self-hostableYes
Declared hostingself
Derived from declared hosting, not verified at source.Need an analysis in your context? Shadow AI Sentinel

Quality of this card’s data

58/100

This score measures the quality of the data on this card: price, context, Elo, licence, documented, sourced and fresh. It measures neither the model nor its compliance: for that, see the Trust Index above.

6/8 documented · 2/8 primary sources · 1 older than 90 days

API pricingofficial
Context windownAIvigate assessment
Arena EloLMArena, human preferenceindependent
Benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, SWE-bench…)vendor-reported, not cross-checkednAIvigate assessment
LicencenAIvigate assessment
Data & complianceself-hosted: derivedderived
Adoption (Hugging Face)missing
Hardware requirements (quantizations)computed from model sizemissing
Advanced data · for experts
Architecture, modalities, detailed cost, full benchmarks
▾
Architecture
MoE (384 experts, 32B actifs)
Size
1T total / 32B actifs (MoE)
Cutoff date
—
Inputs
text, image, video
Outputs
text
License
modified-mit
Hosting
self
Hallucination score
—
Estimated cost (API)
Typical exchange (~3k in / 1k out)
≈ $0.0069
1M in + 1M out
≈ $4.95
All benchmarks
Arena Elo1461
MMLU—
GPQA90.5%
HumanEval—
SWE-Bench—
MATH—

Similar models

Articles mentioning it